EDIAIS Logo Photobar
Enterprise Development Impact Assessment Information Service
 
  EDIAIS Conference November 24-25, 2003
 

 

 

 

 
Home
What is EDIAIS?
New Feature
Document
Overview of IA and ED
FAQs

Information Resources

DFID's Approaches to Development
Assessing the Impact of Business Enabling Environments
  • NEW Related Sites
  • Enquiry Desk
    Newsletter
    Discussion Forum
    Feedback
    Additional Resources
    Site Map

    home > conference - November 24-25, 2003

    Enterprise Development Impact Assessment Information Service (EDIAIS)

    NEW DIRECTIONS IN IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT: METHODS AND PRACTICE

    Richard Bond , Freelance Rural Development Consultant and Research Fellow of Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, Prince Kapondamgaga Research Officer, Concern Universal, Dedza, Malawi, and R.P.S. Yadav, Project Coordinator, Indian Farm Forestry Development Co-operative, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan

    Monitoring the Livelihood Platform: Reflections on the Operation of LAST

    Link to full paper

    ABSTRACT

    The LAST method (Bond R and Mukherjee N. 2002 'Livelihood Asset Status Tracking: An Impact Monitoring Tool?' Journal of International Development 14, Wiley. ) was developed for impact monitoring of Livelihood projects for ongoing learning by project management. This evolving method uses a locally developed assessment sheet describing the local range of household situations for each of the livelihood capitals. This facilitates the rapid conversion of a judgement by the enumerator into a centile score used for monitoring of the livelihood platform at various levels of aggregation. It has now had several years of operation by DFID supported projects in India and amongst other users more recently has been taken up by Concern Universal in Malawi. Questions that need addressing at this stage of development are discussed. What issues have emerged in the use of the method? Is its utility as the design intended? For example is it really rapid enough to provide good coverage of large projects several times a year, and anyway does management really want to learn about emerging impacts? Can the results of such judgement-based methods be considered as reliable? Do different enumerators score the same? What about biases? Is it accurate? What analysis can be done and what about attribution? How might it be further developed? These are the issues taken up in this paper. Initial results seem promising but caution in application is required.

     

    to top of page

     

     

     

    The Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded by clicking here

    Adobe